Top bar
Sponsors
« European Email Marketing Survey | Reminder: Ready, Steady, Email is next week! »
Posted by on February 18, 2009

The from field – a key tool in getting opened


{lang: 'en-GB'}

Because we're all dealing with busy inboxes and making split second decisions whether to read now, later – or delete,it's important to craft an email that is immediately recognised by the recipient as they are scanning through new email.

The sender line in the from field is your key to getting opened. What are your choices? There are a number, actually – and the one you select should correctly reflect the relationship you have with each recipient.

    * From your company – The from field works well when personalised, but if you don’t have enough information about the subscriber (e.g. who their point of contact is in your company) or if they are a prospect, you’ll most likely choose your company name. Your goal should be to achieve personalisation as the relationship deepens.

    * From a brand associated with your company – If you have a wide variety of products and services, you’ll want the email to come from the brand the subscriber has purchased, or has indicated they’d like to hear more about the products/services of the brand.

    * From someone at your company - Here’s where the personalisation opportunities kick in. For example, the email could come from the customer’s Account Manager, from the sales person or the Customer Service rep, etc. Avoid using a personal name that means nothing to the subscriber – it can at best just get deleted as unknown, or at worst be perceived as a spammer’s ploy.

Don’t forget you have the technology at your fingertips to test the from field. Take advantage of this technology to confirm you are making the right choices.

denise cox, Newsweaver

An addendum: Sean Duffy has posted a comment about the success he has had with Name AND company. And that testing included the use of a generic name and the company name. Interesting results. Thanks for reminding me about the fourth choice of name and company (In fact, I already use that format in my own newsletter). What your post really drives home – testing is essential to find out what works best for your own business.






  • http://www.emailcenteruk.com Sean Duffy

    I have to disagree with you Denise.
    I would say "Personal name – Company" has always outperformed just "Company" in all the dozens of split tests we have run.
    Have a look at:
    http://www.emailcenteruk.com/blog/boost-open-rate…
    People prefer to receive an email from a person rather than a company.

  • http://www.newsweaver.co.uk/emailnewsletters denise cox

    Thanks so much for your post Sean. You bring up great points about the fourth choice "name/company", the success you've had with it – and the important reminder that all marketers should TEST to find what works best for them!